One justification for voting for Trump despite his obvious deficiencies is the judiciary. E.g.
And on the surface, this is understandable. Roe v. Wade and other cases overturned laws that were passed by state legislatures and signed by the governors. But were undone by judicial decisions. So, the key to enacting meaningful protections for the unborn is to fill the judiciary with judges willing to overturn these decisions.One of Trump's Catholic and pro-life advisors, @frfrankpavone, tells me he's sticking with Trump, citing the need for pro-life judges.— Michael J O'Loughlin (@MikeOLoughlin) October 8, 2016
But if you dig a little deeper into the reality, this starts to fall apart.
In order for the "elect Trump for pro-life judges" strategy to work, the following things would need to happen:
- Trump wins the election.
- Trump keeps his promise to nominate judges who would make pro-life decisions, despite this not being any kind of personal priority of his.
- These judges, who are apparently visibly pro-life, and were nominated by a President Trump with all his misogynist history, in the media environment that gave us the War on Women, are confirmed by the Senate.
- Once on the Court, these justices are not influenced by the cultural elite, and continue to make pro-life decisions, enduring harsh criticism that comes with it. (Recall that many of the decisions establishing Same Sex Marriage were made by judges appointed by Republicans)
- These decisions, again made by judges appointed by President Trump that restrict women, are accepted by the public, and do not launch a series of counter-measures including efforts to impeach Trump or these justices, constitutional amendments, and a laser-like focus on the Courts from the abortion lobby.
I would place the probability of each of these as less than 50%.
Making the probability of success for this strategy (0.5 ^ 5), or 1/32 at best.
Now, all things are possible with God. Though I don't think "with God" and "President Trump" belong in the same sentence.
I'm afraid there aren't any shortcuts. We need to move elite opinion such that pro-life candidates and judges are acceptable. Maybe, and otherwise popular president could get away with nominating a judge with a pro-life record, as President Bush did with Roberts and Alito when he was still popular. A President Trump, if elected, will never be popular enough to do that.
It also paints a dim view of our judiciary, which may be supported by reality, but I don't think is healthy. That judges don't make decisions based on the evidence before them or arguments presented or the text itself, but on their pre-existing ideological commitments. Again, maybe this is how things have worked out, but it's not for the best.
The Trump shortcut to a pro-life decision is closed, if it was ever open. The only thing is for us to do the hard work of making the case for the unborn. It does seem difficult, but the Truth is on our side. Given that, we shouldn't need to sell ourselves to the likes of Trump to achieve protections for the unborn.
Please see my election disclaimer post.